<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Webenso &#187; Search Engine Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webenso.com/category/seo-search-engine-optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webenso.com</link>
	<description>Build a Better WordPress Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Even with help, Bing struggles with duplicate content</title>
		<link>http://webenso.com/even-with-help-bing-struggles-with-duplicate-content/</link>
		<comments>http://webenso.com/even-with-help-bing-struggles-with-duplicate-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Alice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webenso.com/?p=1780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diving into Bing Webmaster's Index Explorer  and URL Normalization features, I find duplicate content a thorny issue for Bing that even the rel canonical tag doesn't seem to help]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="float:left; margin: 3px 5px 3px 5px"src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/seo2.png" alt="seo: search engine optimization" title="seo: search engine optimization" width="122" height="50" /><strong>Fair warning, this one is for the SEO geeks out there.</strong>
Checking indexation and for duplicate content issues on Bing is sometimes overlooked with all the focus on Google.  But it&#8217;s always good to check once in a while to see how your site&#8217;s SEO is doing on Bing. Check out my basic overview of <a href="http://webenso.com/bing-webmaster-tools/" title="Bing Webmaster Tools" target="_blank">Bing Webmaster Tools</a> if it is new for you.  
</p><p>
In this case, I had a client that had a number of very similar pages that did not fully have the rel canonical tag fully applied as a solution. Based on Eric Enge&#8217;s interview with Duane Forrester, where Duane stated <a href="http://www.stonetemple.com/search-algorithms-and-bing-webmaster-tools-with-duane-forrester/" title="Duane Forrester Bing Interview" target="_blank">&#8220;If we are finding your pages, but not keeping them in the index, there is a reason for that.&#8221;</a>  I decided to see what Bing Webmaster&#8217;s Index Explorer had indexed as &#8220;quality content&#8221; as a data point.  
</p>
<span id="more-1780"></span>
<p><div id="attachment_1781" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 569px"><img src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/bing-indexation.jpg" alt="Bing Webmaster Indexation Stats" title="Bing Webmaster Indexation Stats" width="559" height="343" class="size-full wp-image-1781" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Bing Webmaster Indexation Stats, the spike in the middle was due to some crawl errors.</p></div>The answer was: apparently everything and more.  Index Explorer listed more than 70,000 URLs.  To put this in perspective, Google indexation of this site is about 2000 pages.  While there still duplicate content issues with this site (true duplicate content, not just similar pages), particularly with a URL parameter used as a tracking parameter, this seemed extreme.  An examination of the URLs in the Index Explorer showed indeed the parameter the main culprit.</p>
<p>Google introduced the URL parameters settings in Webmasters Tools so you could help Google decide whether to crawl pages with a parameter.  With Google this is working fairly well. Bing has recently introduced a similar feature, called &#8220;URL Normalization&#8221;.  The feature is confusing, you have two choices:  &#8220;Enabled&#8221; and &#8220;Disabled&#8221;.  Non intuitively &#8220;Disabled&#8221; means that Bing doesn&#8217;t do any &#8220;URL normalization&#8221;, so if you want the search engine to do the normalization you enable it.  What that means is not entirely clear, but the instructions on the page say &#8220;use this page to specify the parameter &#8220;abc&#8221; be ignored &#8230;&#8221;  So apparently <a href="http://www.bing.com/community/webmaster/f/12248/p/670179/9664296.aspx" title="bing forums thread on URL Normalization" target="_blank">&#8220;enabled&#8221; means &#8220;ignored&#8221;</a>.  Clear?  Maybe to you.  It hurts my head.
</p>
In any case it doesn&#8217;t work.  2 weeks later Bing Webmaster tells me that its indexation is still north of 75,000 pages.  A <code>site: </code> command at bing.com is still at 11,000 pages plus.  And annoyingly, the pages we do have canonical tags on, are showing up multiple times in the site: SERPs.   I have heard through the grapevine that Bing is having problems processing the rel canonical tag properly, it appears this is true.  Of course to be fair SEOs complain that Google doesn&#8217;t always remove canonicalized duplicate content either.
<p>
So far the tools at my disposal have proven ineffectual in addressing the duplicate content in Bing&#8217;s index. Of course the search engines have the position that rel canonical is a hint, a 301 is the preference, but a 301 is not an option here.</p>
<p>And even more sadly, I didn&#8217;t even get to a strategy for the similar pages. </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webenso.com/even-with-help-bing-struggles-with-duplicate-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Your Site Go Dark on January 18th?</title>
		<link>http://webenso.com/sopa-internet-censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://webenso.com/sopa-internet-censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Alice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Online Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webenso.com/?p=1741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many sites are planning to "go dark" on January 18th to protest the proposed SOPA and PIPA legislation pending in the US Congress.   Here's more about SOPA and some SEO factors to consider before you join in.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/internet_censorship.jpg"><img src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/internet_censorship.jpg" alt="Stop Internet Censorship" title="Stop Internet Censorship" width="173" height="240" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1743" /></a>Many websites are planning a blackout on January 18th to protest the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Online_Piracy_Act" title="Stop Online Piracy">SOPA</a> legislation.  Like many things, SOPA (Stop Online Piracy) started out as a well intentioned effort, mainly spearheaded by the music industry, to tackle piracy and copyright infringement by &#8220;rogue&#8221; websites.  However many think the legislation goes too far. 
</p><p>
The opponents say that SOPA would give the US government the ability to completely block a website from US viewing even if just one link on that site violates copyright.  It wouldn&#8217;t matter if the link was created by a user and not the site owner, blockage would still be possible.  If that doesn&#8217;t bother you, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57329001-281/how-sopa-would-affect-you-faq/" title="FAQ on SOPA" target="_blank">this FAQ on SOPA may</a>.  No wonder sites such as reddit &#8211; which are driven by user generated content &#8211; are up in arms over this legislation and plan to <a href="http://techland.time.com/2012/01/12/sopa-reddit-confirms-january-18-blackout-wikipedia-and-others-may-follow/" title="Reddit plans to go dark on January 18th" target="_blank">go dark on January 18th</a> as a protest.
</p><p>
While there is some fearmongering going on here, it is clear that the legislation is dangerous and not really in the spirit of a free and open internet that many of us expect. SOPA opponents have many valid points.  While there are signs that the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/14/white-house-sopa-pipa_n_1206347.html" title="White House will not support SOPA, PIPA" target="_blank">White House is beginning to waver</a> in its support of the bill, we are not out of the woods yet.
</p>
<h3>Joining the SOPA blackout protest?  Read this first</h3>
<p>Many are urging webmasters to protest by posting a statement on their site or altering their site to redirect to this effective <a href="http://americancensorship.org/infographic.html" title="AmericanCensorship.org" target="_blank">AmericanCensorship.org infographic</a>.  There are already WordPress plugins created that you can use.  However before you run off and implement any of these, consider that your actions may have a negative impact on your site&#8217;s SEO. Have a read of this post: 
<a href="https://plus.google.com/115984868678744352358/posts/Gas8vjZ5fmB" title="The RIGHT way to do a site outage" target="_blank">How to participate in the outage without hurting your site with Google search.</a>  Google recommends that you have your site return a 503 HTTP status code so that it knows not to spider your content that day.</p>
<p>It occurs to me that maybe Google should just not crawl that day?
</p>
<p style="color:#3f3f3f;font-style:italic">Picture by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aussiegold/" title="Flickr - aussiegold" target="_blank">aussiegold</a> and published under the Flickr Creative Commons License</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webenso.com/sopa-internet-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yoast&#8217;s WordPress SEO Plugin &#8211; Review</title>
		<link>http://webenso.com/wordpress-seo-plugin-yoast/</link>
		<comments>http://webenso.com/wordpress-seo-plugin-yoast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Alice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webenso.com/?p=1719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to recommend the All in One SEO WordPress SEO plugin, but the more I use Yoast's WordPress SEO Plugin - the bigger fan I become.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://yoast.com/wordpress/seo/"><img src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/WordPress-SEO-Yoast.png" alt="WordPress SEO by Yoast" title="WordPress SEO by Yoast" width="152" height="144" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1728" /></a>For quite a while I routinely recommended the All in SEO WordPress plugin, but that changed when Yoast introduced his WordPress plugin.  I&#8217;ve used it on four WordPress sites and each time my appreciation of this wonderful plugin has grown.  Not just for myself, but also because it helps my clients write more SEO optimized posts and pages.</p>  
<p>I used to get frustrated after carefully explaining to new bloggers and site owners how to write SEO friendly permalinks, page titles and meta descriptions &#8212; and then watching them forget everything I told them by creating poorly optimized posts and pages.  Now I can lead the horse to water, and he (or she) actually drinks it!   Another great bonus about this plugin is that is it so comprehensive is that it does the job of several plugins.  For example there is no need to install a sitemap plugin &#8211; Yoast&#8217;s plugin will take care of that too for you.
</p>
<span id="more-1719"></span>
<p>There is so many features in this plugin, that I am not going to cover them all, but I would like to show how it helps you optimize your pages and posts to be SEO friendly. When installed, the plugin adds an additional form to your page/post edit screen that has three tabs. The key to the first tab is to first choose your focus keyword (a drop list appears to help you refine the keyword even further &#8211; and there is a related keyword button).  Once you&#8217;ve decided on your keyworde, you can then customize the page title and meta description (here I have customized the title but not the meta description tag). Then you can use the initial page analysis results as a guide to optimize further.  Perhaps you need to weave in your keyword into your content?  You&#8217;ll be reminded to do so here:</p>
<div id="attachment_1722" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 570px"><a href="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/wordpress-seo-plugin.png"><img src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/wordpress-seo-plugin-e1325898408315.png" alt="WordPress SEO Plugin" title="WordPress SEO Plugin" width="560" height="452" class="size-full wp-image-1722" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">First Tab has the Snippet Preview and is where you choose your focus keyword and customize your page title and meta description.</p></div>
<p>
The second tab takes the page analysis a level deeper.  You&#8217;ll get reminders on placing your keyword in the first paragraph of your copy (as I am reminded here) and a reading level score.  </p>
<div id="attachment_1723" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 569px"><a href="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/seo-page-analysis.png"><img src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/seo-page-analysis-e1325898452330.png" alt="SEO Page Analysis" title="SEO Page Analysis" width="559" height="452" class="size-full wp-image-1723" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Taking the SEO analysis of your page to a deeper level</p></div>
<p>The third tab has a lot of power.  Here you can noindex your page if you need to, setup a 301 redirect, also define your canonical URL, and even tweak your sitemap priority settings.</p>
<div id="attachment_1724" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 570px"><a href="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/yoast-seo-wordpress.png"><img src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/yoast-seo-wordpress-e1325898225304.png" alt="Advanced Yoast SEO WordPress Plugin" title="Advanced Yoast SEO WordPress Plugin" width="560" height="441" class="size-full wp-image-1724" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Don&#039;t overlook the third tab, there is a lot of power here.</p></div>
<p>
The plugin has many more features available in a separate menu on the sidebar.  Yoast has taken the trouble to add commentary to help you use the settings correctly.  Just taking the time to read through his comments could help many learn SEO.  The plugin is available in the <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wordpress-seo/" title="WordPress SEO by Yoast">WordPress plugin repository</a> (search on &#8220;WordPress SEO Yoast&#8221;) and by <a href="http://yoast.com/wordpress/seo/" title="More about Yoast's WordPress SEO Plugin">download from his site</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webenso.com/wordpress-seo-plugin-yoast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which is better?  SEO or PPC?</title>
		<link>http://webenso.com/to-seo-or-to-ppc-useful-info/</link>
		<comments>http://webenso.com/to-seo-or-to-ppc-useful-info/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guest Author</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webenso.com/to-seo-or-to-ppc-useful-info/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which is better to get traffic to your website - SEO or PPC?  Key questions to ask.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 5px 10px 5px 5px; float:left;" src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ryanlerch_thinkingboy_small.png" alt="Deciding between SEO and PPC?" title="Thinking Boy " width="146" height="200" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-895" /></a>Once you have a website launched, the next question you need to answer is how you are going to get traffic to it.  </p>
<p>Today you have a lot of options you can choose from.  One way to get traffic is to pay for advertising with the search engines and other networks (such as Facebook).  Or instead of paying for advertising, you can focus on getting your website found when people search for a solution that your business provides.  You can also attract interest with social media. In this article we are going to look at advertising using PPC and ranking using SEO.
</p>
<span id="more-171"></span>
<h2>What is PPC?</h2>
<p>A popular way to advertise is by using PPC.  PPC means <strong>Pay Per Click</strong>. Often when you search on Google or Bing &#8211; you will see &#8220;sponsored&#8221; listings at the top of the page and/or to the right.  If you click on one of these sponsored links, the advertiser will pay the search engine for that click.  </p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t a simple flat rate.  The advertisers bid for placement in the listings.  You would think the highest bidder would always get the first spot, but this is not always true.  Google and Bing take many factors into consideration, including the quality of the ad and the site and how well it matches the searcher&#8217;s query.  
</p>
<h2>What is SEO?</h2>
<p>SEO &#8211; <strong>search engine optimization</strong> &#8211; is the art and science of getting your website to appear in the coveted top <strong>organic</strong> listings (those that appear under the sponsored listings.  SEO activities include optimizing your website pages to match the keywords that searchers enter into Google and the other search engines, and also promoting your site to get other websites to link to yours.</p>
<h2>Which is better?</h2>
<p>It depends on the answers to the questions below:
<ol>
<li><strong>What&#8217;s the competition like?  </strong>The effort it takes to rank for a set of keywords can vary widely based on the market and how &#8220;niche&#8221; your keywords are.   If you are a local business, using local SEO to rank for search terms that have your city name in them can be successful without a lot of effort and time.  However if you want to rank for &#8220;car insurance&#8221; you will have to have a big SEO budget and time.  </li>
<li><strong>What will be your PPC spend?</strong> Competition matters in the PPC world too.  Some terms (legal issues are an example) are quite expensive to bid on.</li>
<li><strong>What&#8217;s your timeframe?</strong>  To get traffic quickly, PPC will be much faster than SEO.   New sites can take 3 months or more to rank consistently.   You may want to consider using PPC to kick things off for your business until your SEO efforts start to pay off.</li>
<li><strong>Are you testing?</strong>  Maybe you are creating a new landing page for a product you are offering.  A focused PPC test can give you a lot of information on how well your page converts.  This information can help guide both SEO and PPC efforts in influencing the headline you write and the keywords you use in both your PPC campaigns and SEO efforts.</li>
<li><strong>How do you want to target your audience?</strong>  With advertising, particularly on Facebook, you can get fairly precise on who to advertise to.  Google gives you the ability to select the geographic locations to advertise to.  If you advertise on the display network (adsense ads) you can even choose the websites to advertise on.  Facebook additionally lets you target certain demographics and interests.  While you can target your SEO efforts as well, by its nature, SEO traffic will be less targeted &#8211; focusing only on the keywords used in the search query. </li>
<li><strong>What do your competitors do?</strong>  If your competitors are heavy users of advertising and their sites are not well optimized, you should ask yourself why.  It might be an opportunity for you to capitalize on their oversight, but then again there might be a good reason why they are focusing their efforts in one area over the other.  Keep in mind, that certain types of sites (think a lot of content) lend themselves more naturally to SEO, and others more to PPC.
</ol>
<p>Many online businesses will employ both SEO and PPC campaigns to get traffic.  To answer the question, which is better? the answer is neither, it all depends on what you want to accomplish and the market you want to compete in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webenso.com/to-seo-or-to-ppc-useful-info/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What most people miss about Google Webmasters Tools verification</title>
		<link>http://webenso.com/verify-website-google-webmasters-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://webenso.com/verify-website-google-webmasters-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Alice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google webmaster tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webenso.com/?p=1651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The missing step that most articles and videos don't cover with Google Webmasters Tools site verification.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Google.png"><img src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Google.png" alt="Google" title="Google" width="163" height="66" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1656" /></a>Getting your site set up and verified with <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/" title="Google Webmasters Tools">Google Webmaster Tools</a> is one of the tasks that should be done with any new site.  For one thing, if your site hasn&#8217;t been indexed yet by Google, it will be if you submit it to GWMT (Google Webmaster Tools).  Second, as I have mentioned before, <a href="http://webenso.com/google-webmasters-tools-verification-easier/" title="Google Webmaster Tools Verification now Easier">GWMT is a communication channel</a> from Google to you about any problems that could hurt your site&#8217;s SEO.  </p>
<p>One annoying thing, and many people miss this, is that you should verify both the &#8216;www&#8217; and non &#8216;www&#8217; versions of your site with Google Webmasters Tools, even if you have a 301 redirect (as you should) setup from one to the another.</p>
<span id="more-1651"></span>
<h2>Why verify both the &#8216;www&#8217; and non &#8216;www&#8217; versions of your site?</h2>
<ul>
<li>Google is pretty smart about the &#8216;www&#8217; subdomain, but telling it you own both your domain and the &#8216;www&#8217; subdomain just is another signal that helps your site.  Google doesn&#8217;t automatically transfer the trust and authority it&#8217;s given to a domain to a subdomain. This is because it is possible for someone different to own a subdomain.</li>
<li>Verifying both versions allows you to set the &#8220;preferred domain&#8221; (Site Configuration -> Settings) in GWMT, again another signal that can only help.</li>
<li>If you ever have to move your site to another domain, you will want to submit a &#8220;Change of Address&#8221; in GWMT.  You will not be able to do this unless both the &#8216;www&#8217; and non &#8216;www&#8217; versions of your site have been verified.</li>
</ul>
<h2>More on Google Webmasters Tools Verification</h2>
<p>To verify your site in Google Webmasters Tools there are three methods (the third method is newer):
<ol>
<li>Add a meta tag in the <head> of your home page</li>
<li>Upload a file to the root directory that GWMT provides to you</li>
<li>Add a DNS record for your site and telling Google about it.</li>
</ol>
<p><a href="http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=176792" title="DNS Text Verification">DNS Text Verification</a> was released in mid 2011 by Google.
<p>
There are many step by step articles and videos on how to do the verification, including in this blog.  Also as one might expect, there is a <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/official-google-site-verification-plugin/" title="Google Site Verification Plugin">WordPress plugin</a> that makes it easy to do the verification if you don&#8217;t want to deal with FTP, editing your site or DNS records.  Here are some links to resources:</p>
<ul>
<li>I cover <a href="http://webenso.com/sitemap-submission-best-for-search-engines/" title="Verification and Sitemap Submission">both the Yahoo and Google verification process</a> and submitting a sitemap.</li>
<li>One of many <a href="http://youtu.be/REpB78kp_dI" title="Webstarts GWMT verification" target="_blank">videos on GWMT verification</a> (covers the HTML file upload option and doesn&#8217;t mention DNS Text Verification).  Most of these videos assume you are using particular hosting provider. </li>
<li>Article that covers <a href="http://www.canonicalseo.com/google-web-site-verification/" title="Google Site Verification" target="_blank">all three verification methods</a></li>
<li>Why <a href="http://dejanseo.com.au/address-change-in-google-webmaster-tools-vs-301-redirects/" title="Address Change in GWMT" target="_blank">submitting a change of address is beneficial</a> when you move domains even if you also use 301 redirects.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webenso.com/verify-website-google-webmasters-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Forwarding and SEO</title>
		<link>http://webenso.com/domain-forwarding-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://webenso.com/domain-forwarding-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Alice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webenso.com/?p=1616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is domain forwarding bad or good for SEO?  What's the best SEO friendly way to forward a domain to a out of the box marketing website? We look at 3 ways to forward your domain and their SEO ramifications.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1617" title="Domain Management" src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/http-www-300x240.jpg" alt="Domain Management" width="300" height="240" />Ever worked with a lead management marketing system?  There are many out there, for a monthly fee, you get a website complete with a choice of landing pages, auto-responders (often prewritten for you) and a contact management system.  They work well with online advertising; where your banner, PPC ads drive traffic directly to your pre-built landing pages, generating leads for you.</p>  <p>So what about setting up your own domain and pointing it to your marketing system?  Not a problem, for  $10 or so, you buy a domain and then forward it to your marketing system URL.  </p>
<p>This won&#8217;t cause any SEO problems for my new domain, right?  Well, <strong>&#8220;it depends&#8221;</strong>. </p>
<span id="more-1616"></span>
<h3>Domain Forwarding &#8211; 301 and 302 Redirects</h3>
<p>The simplest way to forward your domain is with a redirect.  This means that when a user visits your domain, say <em>www.mynewdomain.com</em>, the server sends back a code to the browser that tells it to go to a new location, such as <em>iuser.marketingsystem.com</em>.  There are two types of <em>my website has moved</em> codes.  One is <strong>HTTP code 301</strong> which says the new location is permanent, the other is <strong>HTTP code 302</strong> which says the move is temporary. </p><p> If you browse SEO articles on the web you&#8217;ll see advice to always use 301 redirects to make sure that the SEO benefit passes through to the target domain.  But is that really what you want here?  If you are interested in building up the SEO power of your new domain, a 301 redirect will defeat that goal as it just passes all that link juice to the marketing system, which may not be what you want.  A 302 might be better, although with 302s, Google will decide which URL to index, which may or may not be in your favor.</p>
<h3>Domain Forwarding &#8211; with masking</h3>
<p>With the redirect described above, the user will see the <em>iuser.marketingsystem.com</em> URL in the browser after the redirect completes.  Masking, also called <strong>URL Frame</strong>, will hide the target domain from the user, keeping <em>www.mynewdomain.com</em> visible in the URL box in the browser.  Sounds perfect, yes?  Well, let&#8217;s look at what spider sees when it visits the domain. Here&#8217;s an example 
<code>&lt;frameset rows='100%, *' frameborder=no framespacing=0 border=0&gt;&lt;frame src="http://iuser.marketingsystem.com" name=mainwindow frameborder=no framespacing=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0&gt;&lt;/frame&gt;</code>
</p>
<p>This code tells the visitor that the content is all coming from the marketingsystem.com domain.  The general consensus is this <a href="http://www.yourseoplan.com/experts-domain-masking/" target="_blank">masking using frames are bad for SEO</a> and most tests agree with this.  Your mileage may vary.  In any case, savvy users visiting with Chrome or Firefox might notice that the browser is getting a response from <em>marketingsystem.com</em>, specially if it is slow (<em>Waiting on &#8230;.</em>). So, although you can insert meta tags in the frameset code to try and optimize the &#8220;page&#8221;, this approach is not ideal either. </p>
<h3>Name Server solution</h3>
<p>So what&#8217;s left?  Instead of forwarding the domain, you can use DNS to map the domain to the target system&#8217;s nameservers.  DNS is how the internet determines where your website is actually hosted, it translates the domain name to an IP address.  By pointing to the marketing system nameservers you are transferring that translation process to the marketing system which will figure out what files to show your web visitor.  Since in this we are trying to build the SEO value of our domain rather than the marketing system URL, this is a better approach than redirecting or forwarding with masking.  </p><p>There are a couple of drawbacks however.  One is that if both domains get indexed, Google may consider this duplicate content.  You want to avoid having any links go directly to your marketing system URL.  Also, as much as you can, customize the marketing system website.  If your website looks like a hundred others, it will be harder to get it to rank highly.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webenso.com/domain-forwarding-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s rel=author Authorship feature</title>
		<link>http://webenso.com/rel-author-google-authorship/</link>
		<comments>http://webenso.com/rel-author-google-authorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Alice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webenso.com/?p=1556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week I finally revisited getting the Google Authorship feature (rel="author") working for my posts.  You have the choice of a couple of approaches, and there are several details you need to pay attention to, to get it right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah the old days.  The early days when all Google looked at was how many backlinks pointed to your page.  These days, <strong>trust, creditability and authority</strong> signals are a big part of what Google looks for when deciding whether to rank your page in the top ten.   This past summer, leveraging Google profiles, Google released another feature that helps it do just that.  You can now tag your articles with <code>rel="author"</code> HTML markup to link your pages to your Google profile &#8211; which makes you more &#8220;real&#8221; in Google&#8217;s eyes.  The nice thing about this is that then Google will put a pic of you next to the snippet of your article that shows up in the search results as Danny Sullivan appears below.</p> <div id="attachment_1557" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 538px"><a href="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/danny-author.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-1557" title="Danny Sullivan article" src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/danny-author.png" alt="Danny Sullivan article" width="528" height="100" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Danny&#39;s article with SEO advice to Bill Gates </p></div><p>Google&#8217;s desire to tie content to &#8220;real&#8221; people perhaps sheds some light on the<a href="http://searchengineland.com/google-removes-mashable-sesame-street-other-prominent-accounts-from-google-plus-86788"> recent mass removal of non user Google+ accounts</a>.</p><p><span id="more-1556"></span></p> <p>I had initially tried to set it up on my blog but it didn&#8217;t work.  After seeing tweets from several people that it didn&#8217;t work for them either, I put it aside and forgot about it. However this week, I was determined to get it working.  The concept to get here is that you have to establish a bi-directional link between your blog and your Google profile, as a way to validate that it is really you that wrote the article.  So far, sounds easy right?  Well, unfortunately there are a lot of little details.</p>
<p><h3>Set up your Google profile</h3></p><p>If you have a Gmail or Google+ account, you already have a Google profile.  You might have even filled it in back in the Buzz days.  Sign into your Google account and select <strong>Profile </strong>from the right hand dropdown on Googles black bar that appears on Gmail and other Google properties.</p>
<ul><li>Add a decent, recognizable picture to your profile.  Picture of your cat won&#8217;t work.</li>
<li>Set up the <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1229920">+1 tab on your Google profile</a> as Google&#8217;s authorship instructions tells you to.</li>
<li>Add a link in &#8220;Other Profiles&#8221; to the site that you are publishing on.  Ideally the link should point to a bio page of you and the &#8220;This page is specifically about me&#8221; checkbox should be checked. However in my Google profile this checkbox has disappeared so your mileage may vary.</li>
</ul> 
<p><h3>Add tags to your articles and bio page</h3></p><p>Now you have a choice.  You can established the bi-directional link as I described above, or you can establish the link between a bio page and your Google profile and then mark up your web pages with <code>rel="author"</code> to reference your bio page.  Adding a bit to the confusion, is Google recently introduced an alternative to the markup on the articles using <code>?rel=author</code> which is explained on the <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=1408986">Google webmasters help page</a>, ostensively to help out people who have a limited ability to edit their site.  I haven&#8217;t tried this approach yet.</p><p>If you are sticking to the original approach (whether you are using the <code>rel="me"</code> links in an author bio page or not), watch this Matt Cutt&#8217;s video below:</p>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FgFb6Y-UJUI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<p>If you have a bio page on your blog (and you really should), adding the <code>rel="me"</code> is easy.  What&#8217;s harder is figuring out how to turn your author&#8217;s name into a hyperlink with the <code>rel="author"</code> pointing to your bio page.   Joost highlights a nice alternative approach to this with an <a href="http://yoast.com/wordpress-rel-author-rel-me/">About link in your WordPress menu using XFN</a>.</p> <p>A couple of other things you need to worry about:</p><ul> <li>Many WordPress themes are stripping out the &#8220;rel&#8221; tags, do a view source to see if this is happening to you too.  If so, Joost&#8217;s article addresses this, and there is a also a <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/allow-rel-and-html-in-author-bios/">WordPress Plugin</a> that you can install</li> <li>As Joost highlights, you need to submit a <a href="https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dHdCLVRwcTlvOWFKQXhNbEgtbE10QVE6MQ">form to Google</a> once you have set it up.  Another little but important detail!</li> </ul><p>To check whether you have done everything right you can use the <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets">Rich Snippets Testing Tool</a> Google provides.  You want it to look something like the below:</p><p><a href="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/kab-rich-snippet1.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1570" title="Rich Snippet of WebEnso Blog Post" src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/kab-rich-snippet1.png" alt="Rich Snippet of WebEnso Blog Post" width="550" height="226" /></a></p>
<p>Now you sit back and wait for your smiling face starts to showing up in snippets in the search results</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webenso.com/rel-author-google-authorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO your WordPress images</title>
		<link>http://webenso.com/seo-your-wordpress-images/</link>
		<comments>http://webenso.com/seo-your-wordpress-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Alice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo friendly images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webenso.com/?p=1514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although advances have been made in this area, you should assume that an image to a search engine looks like unreadable code. So what you need to do to surround the image with hints on what the image might be about. This gives you another opportunity to add your primary and secondary keywords to your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although advances have been made in this area, you should assume that an image to a search engine looks like unreadable code.   So what you need to do to surround the image with hints on what the image might be about.  This gives you another opportunity to add your primary and secondary keywords to your page.</p>

<span id="more-1514"></span>

<p>Before you even upload the image to WordPress consider renaming the image filename from the SEO unfriendly (for example) DCN0019.jpg to a filename that describes the image (such as &#8220;wordpress-image-uploader.jpg&#8221;).    Given how organizationally challenged I am, I don&#8217;t understand why people don&#8217;t do this, how do you search through images if you leave them with unrecognizable names?  When I name an image I avoid spaces as well.</p>

<p>Now you are ready to upload the image into your post.  Click on the little box to the right of <em>&#8220;Upload/Insert&#8221;</em> above your post.  When the uploader dialog pop ups, take the few seconds and fill in the tag fields before inserting the image into your post.  Here are the tags to fill in. </p>
<ul>
	<li><strong>alt</strong> This tag is the most important.  Add a keyword rich description of your image here. </li>
	<li><strong>title</strong> Ever notice how a little yellow tag appears on some images when you mouse over them?  You can get this effect by setting the title tag.   Note that some browsers may not support this well.  Is it important for SEO?  It depends on who you ask, but I always set it, usually to the same as my alt tag.</li>
	<li><strong>caption</strong> Some SEOs feel that captions help the SEO of your images, it&#8217;s a nice way to describe the image to your audience as well.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_1516" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 420px"><a href="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/wordpress-image-uploader.png"><img src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/wordpress-image-uploader.png" alt="Tags in WordPress Image Uploader" title="Tags in WordPress Image Uploader" width="410" height="334" class="size-full wp-image-1516" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Make sure to fill in the alt and title tags</p></div>

If this really feels like too much of a bother for you, consider installing the SEO friendly images plugin.  This plugin will automatically set the tags for you.  
<div id="attachment_1515" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 377px"><a href="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/seo-friendly-options.png"><img src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/seo-friendly-options.png" alt="SEO Friendly Images Plugin Options" title="SEO Friendly Images Plugin Options" width="367" height="232" class="size-full wp-image-1515" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Don&#039;t use %name if you use unfriendly image filenames</p></div>

<p>Like everything, it&#8217;s more powerful if you know how to use it well.   The default options assume you have a nice friendly filename that is descriptive of the image.  If you are not going to bother with that, then don&#8217;t use %name.  %title is the post title, which is often a great choice, but keep in mind that if you have multiple images in your post they are going to have the same tags.  Still anything reasonably descriptive is better than having blank tags.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webenso.com/seo-your-wordpress-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Profile Makes You More Visible</title>
		<link>http://webenso.com/google-profile-photo/</link>
		<comments>http://webenso.com/google-profile-photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Alice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webenso.com/?p=1508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tried searching on your name recently? If you have updated your Google profile with a picture, as I have recently done, you might be in for a nice surprise. Although I&#8217;m still not happy with my photo (still working on one where I actually smile and don&#8217;t look like an idiot) I must admit it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Tried searching on your name recently?  If you have updated your Google profile with a picture, as I have recently done, you might be in for a nice surprise.   Although I&#8217;m still not happy with my photo (still working on one where I actually smile and don&#8217;t look like an idiot) I must admit it was kind of nice seeing my face stare back at me from the SERPs.  

<a href="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/kathy-alice-brown-SERPs.png"><img src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/kathy-alice-brown-SERPs.png" alt="Kathy Alice Brown" title="Kathy Alice Brown" width="554" height="271" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1509" /></a>

I guess I should write on why you might want a picture of you to appear in the search engine results when people search on your name &#8230; but I do I really need to?  

Like most people who are in the new Google+ network, I had spent some time on polishing up my profile and posting some pics to my &#8220;scrapbook&#8221;.  Google+ is, at the current moment, <a href="http://news4geeks.net/2011/08/24/google-feels-the-pain-of-users-who-cant-get-on-google/">closed to new members</a>, causing frustration, but that shouldn&#8217;t mean you can&#8217;t enhance your google profile or create one (if you can&#8217;t, let me know).    If you have a gmail account, just log in .. click on your email address in the new black bar that appears at the top of the page and click on <i><b>Create Profile</b></i>.  Don&#8217;t forget to upload a photo.

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webenso.com/google-profile-photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Way to Improve Website Performance</title>
		<link>http://webenso.com/improve-website-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://webenso.com/improve-website-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Alice</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webenso.com/?p=1502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Improving website performance usually involves changing your code and adding caching.  Here's a way to get your website cached and served from datacenters all over the globe for free, which will improve access to your website for anyone no matter where they are.  And you get additional security to boot.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/cloudflare2.png"><img src="http://webenso.com/wbb/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/cloudflare2-300x147.png" alt="CloudFlare helps Website Performance" title="CloudFlare Website Performance" width="300" height="147" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1503" /></a>Slow website?   Webenso has never had great performance, but adding the social media buttons has really slowed things down.   Addressing my website performance has been on my to-do list for a while, so it was perhaps serendipitous that I caught a short presentation from Michelle Zatlyn from <a href="http://www.cloudflare.com">CloudFlare</a> last night on improving blog performance.

You do need to care about your website speed.  Not only because your users aren&#8217;t going to stick around for a website that takes 10 seconds or more to load, but it&#8217;s bad for SEO as well.   Over a year ago, Google announced they <a href="http://webenso.com/site-performance-google-webmaster-tools/">would be taking page load time into account</a> for their ranking algorithms. 

CloudFlare originally was conceived as a way to block hacker and spam bot traffic to make your website more secure.  Michelle quickly got the feedback that any solution they came up with needed to avoid slowing things down.  So CloudFlare now has a dual purpose, it looks for &#8220;bad&#8221; traffic and filters that away from your website, and it speeds up your website&#8217;s performance as well.     The CloudFlare approach is a little different than the standard remedies for slow websites, it&#8217;s not about changing your javascript to load asynchronously or hosting social media button images or installing caching on WordPress (which are all things you should still consider).   What CloudFlare does is become a proxy for your website, it caches your pages and can serve your site from it&#8217;s datacenters around the world.      So instead of someone from Hong Kong requesting your site from its hosting location in the USA, they will get it from the CloudFlare&#8217;s Asian datacenter much quicker.   Your website &#8212; served from distributed locations from around the world &#8212; for free.  Cool huh?

<span id="more-1502"></span>

I must admit I had a little trepidation in allowing them to take over my DNS zone records, but I&#8217;m giving it a shot.   I&#8217;ll monitor the Google reported site load speed in Webmaster Tools (which due to the social media buttons is reported at 17 seconds!) and see if it makes a difference.  

CloudFlare has done a good job of making the setup easy.  You will need access to your hosting account to complete it.  What CloudFlare will do is read your DNS zone files and create one that you will review.  Then you will need to update your nameservers to point to theirs.   It takes about 10 minutes.  There is a free plan you can use to check them out, and if you want more customization ability, they have paid plans as well.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webenso.com/improve-website-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

